The advent of the sociability inspires the desire, the delight of reciprocal approval, that is, of vanity. The necessities of the spirit (not of the body) are the beddings of the society, that is, the necessities establish the society and the reciprocal approval constitutes the delight of the society in such way that the social delight is become into social necessity. The sociability does not support without the vanity or all the social mechanisms motivadores of vanity: arts and sciences. As much one as another one, Rousseau admits, brings the sensation of well-being, of comfort, however, when the man is reached by these sensations (produced for the advent of sciences and the arts), it starts to love them, it is gotten passionate for this comfort and one becomes enslaved of them rejecting the freedom feeling, saying in another way: the benefits of the arts and sciences result in a curse to the man in the measure where it becomes enslaved of the social life starts to desire and to love this slavery. Concerning this Rousseau in the first speech, if thus express: ‘ ‘ while the government and the laws take care of to the security and the good? to be of the men, congregated, sciences, the letters and the arts, less absolute in power and perhaps more powerful, extend guirlandas of flowers on the iron chairs of that they are loaded, drown the feeling to it of this original freedom for which they seemed to have been born, they make with that they love its slavery and they thus form what policiados’ is called peoples; ‘ (ROSSEAU, 1988, p.p. 138, 139). Rousseau, as we saw mentions to sciences and the arts however we go to restrict our study to sciences. The critical reading that Rousseau elaborates on sciences if of not in such a way for the aspect strict epistemolgico and yes for the fact of it to be a social instrument that forms ‘ ‘ peoples policiados’ ‘ , being that this formation implies at the same time in the deformation of the man extracting to it freedom.
Test of this is the carried through Seminaries, Simpsios and Fruns, that argue the philosophy education. Also, this, also was a concern of the OCNs (2006, P. 16), when it emphasizes that: … to think disciplines it Philosophy in average education also demands a quarrel on the courses of graduation in Philosophy, that prepare the professional futures, and of the philosophical research in general, a time that, especially in this it disciplines, not if it of education can dissociar, of the philosophical production of the transmission of the knowledge. Ahead of this, what one expects of the philosophy professor? In accordance with the Lines of direction of the Courses of Graduation in Philosophy, the professor has the following task: to provoke in its educandos the philosophical reflection, presenting the legacy to them of the tradition, taking to think them it of critical and independent form. In the opinion of Spider Martins (2005, P.
10-11): One of the papers that fit to the philosophy professor are assistant in the ticket of the common sense to common-sense, and of this for the philosophical conscience, process that is not automatic. In contrast, obstacles to its accomplishment exist. It is enough to remember the rigidity of the preconceptions, the arraigamento of the certainties, the seduction of the definitive certezas fruits of the indoctrination and that they take in them to the dogmatismo and the fanatism. Or to remember the warm conformismo of the conventions and the habits that many times accomodate in them in the alienation, as imprisoned easy of the ideology. … The function of the professor is to be the mediator between the pupil and the philosophical text, establishing of this form a bridge with the culture, since filosofar it does not become to the edge of the historical context. The severity of this movement depends on the conditions offered for the analysis, by means of a coherent logic and for the exercise of the argument, in order to educate the pupil for the inteligibilidade and, therefore, for intellectual autonomy.
It is obvious that such an attitude towards his wife is nothing but a manifestation of extreme disrespect. We thus seems to be saying: 'It's your duty – to facilitate my life and I have come to expect from you this'. Wow! Attitude to the partner as something for granted may be manifested in various […]