A time that the conflict if decides, the remorse can not be evident. 7. Conscience of magoar the others. A empatia lack in general takes not-intentional the offensive or insensitive behaviors. 8.
To console the others. As they lack of intuition on the other people’s feelings, people with SA have little understanding on as to console somebody or to make them if to feel better. 9. To recognize boredom signals. The incapacity to understand the interests other people’s can take Aspergers to be incompressible or negligent. In the hand inverse, people with SA generally do not perceive when the interlocutor is entediado or disinterested. 10. Introspection and autoconscincia.
Individuals with SA have difficulty to understand its proper feelings or its impact in the other people’s feelings. 11. Clothes and personal hygiene. People with SA less tend to be affected by the pressure of the fellow creatures of what others. As results generally make everything in the way that find more comfortable, without if mattering with the other people’s opinion. That is valid mainly in relation to the form of if dressing and the cares with the proper appearance. 12. Love and reciprocal rancor. As Aspergers they react more pragmatically of what emotionally, its expressions of affection and rancor are in general short and weak. 13. Understanding in embarrassment and step in false. Although the fact of people with SA to have intellectual understanding of constaint and gafes, is incapable to apply these concepts in the emotional level. 14. To deal with critical. People with SA feel themselves forcibly compelled to correct errors, exactly when they are committed by people in authority position, as a professor or a head. Therefore, they can seem imprudently offensive. 15. Speed and quality of the processing of the social relations. As they answer to the social interactions with the reason and not intuition, SA carriers tend to much more slowly process information of relationships of what the normal one, taking the desproporcionais and bothering pauses or delays.
It answered to him. – For me it is a very hypocritical picture -. – Hypocrite? -. The girl was surprised much. Pablo watched with firmness the creation. Soon he walked until a near table, one sat down in her and it remained thinking.
Candle, on the other hand, sat down in the unique chair that had there. I hope to that Pablo left that one lethargy, of that one reflection. He watched after the window the light in the morning. – Hypocrisy is the fingimiento of opposite feelings to which truly they are experienced -. It began his words soon and it watched. – One assumes that one is a painting that represents the love, the pair and the union.
But in fact, like creator, I do not give to credit to which I see, fodder that is a farce -. – Then, he excuses my directness, but the hypocrite you here are and not it painting -. He said Candle to him. He watched it to Pablo. Perhaps he felt that the small one was an insolent person, but was saying the truth. It remained in silence. – I know Since I have wanted to know it to envelope you, to know why as much sadness, as much suffering, and as much resentment. Why he has decided hide-and-seek of the life in the middle of four walls. I have read on Pablo Nocheln in those old woman newspapers and all acclaim like a person humanist to him, who is able to shape in landscapes representations of the love like this one painting which I have opposite. It knows? I have wondered myself where he is that one man, because I have not seen it in the Nocheln house. Unique that I have seen is a bitter being, the able thing to bother itself enormously because I painted the facade of its house, fixed the garden and I cleared the dust to old woman pictures.
Page: 49-50. Paragraph: 4. Ribeiro it searchs to strengthen its opinion in Lovisolo, for who ' ' History became a science that it searchs to find or to rescue the nationality or history of one determined povo' '. Page: 50. Paragraph: 1. The historians had started to study the reconstruction of the national past thus constructing, to the collective memory. Ribeiro cites Pollak, when it says that ' ' The reference to the past serves to keep the harmony of the groups and the institutions that compose one sociedade' '. Page: 50-51.
Paragraph: 2. The world occidental person attended a widening of the collective memory in the end of century XVIII and the preservation of the national memory and its constant revival mark of the governments became. Page: 51. Paragraph: 1. The preservation of the national memory restricted the national conscience. Ribeiro, from there, makes reference the Le Golff ' ' The esquecimentos and silence of History are revealing of these mechanisms of manipulation of the memory coletiva' '.
Page: 51. Paragraph: 2. For Ribeiro, century XIX invented erudio methods, allowing the scientific development of history, based on critical the documentary one. Page: 52. Paragraph: 1. The classic point of view of history if bases on the tradition, valuing the individual and collective experiences, having a critical character to establish lies from removed examples of the past, being possessed an ethical and moral value. Page: 52. Paragraph: 2. For the iluministas the errors of the past were decurrent of a disarticulated and inefficacious reason. Page: 52-53. Paragraph: 3. The iluministas standards if based on the Newtonian conclusions concerning the scientific knowledge of the nature. Ribeiro is used of a text of Wehling to affirm that the central problem of the iluminismo was not to know to conciliate the phenomena that if followed and if they became quickly dominant. Page: 53.
The advent of the sociability inspires the desire, the delight of reciprocal approval, that is, of vanity. The necessities of the spirit (not of the body) are the beddings of the society, that is, the necessities establish the society and the reciprocal approval constitutes the delight of the society in such way that the social […]
So that a text is considered objective, it must clearly be and concise, beyond presenting a neutral point of view. Neutrality the myth of the scientific neutrality it bases if in the estimated one that the objetividade of science is enough to suspend the subjectivity of the scientists, ledo deceit since the choice of what […]
Expensive readers, this is the first time that I write in this espao.espero that as well as I am interested myself very for the opinions of the other authors, takes that somebody also reads my articles therefore wants to learn sufficiently with its critical and tips to be able to always continue in the resulted […]