Continuing the theme: humour is the language of the angels considered etymological and metaphorical relations of soul, animal, humor, mood, etc.The animals are a lot closer to the thing in if (sCHOPENAHUER) why we tendered or cause grace; the animals learned the Buddhists who discovered ZEN (updating of an essence of primitive Buddhism); from PLOTINUS, passing by so many sufis, who warned the SALAT and even the DHIKR of the animals, until ARGUEDAS, testified about made, synchronized that animals and plants they are cosmic and, perhaps, supracosmicamente all traditions agree that animals are what they are, are real MICROTEOS instead MICROTEOS humans have become MICROCOSM and finally MICOCOSMOS and already are even worse or plastic man is a STIGMA of nature)Schopenahuer). The animal is saved by their ignorance (or innocence), angel by his knowledge, and between the two, the man remains in dispute.RUMI. Many saints, mystics and even Islamic esotericism initiates learned from animals, have imitated animals literally; they have been identified with them, have them internalized to become ellos(por supuesto que solo en su parte epifanica, ontofanica, eidetica, noumenal; en esa en la que radica el jeroglifico de ALLAH) anyway, and beyond the scope or non of the above, is an aphorism traditional that the closest thing to an ANIMAL is a Saint or a GLOW that don’t like this can lower and use the analogy Hindu Liberation (awakening) and deep sleep (without dreams) and apply the same arguments and examples… More info: Code.org. What beauty, truth heralda, animals are stars to guide and accompany (Qur’an) and how complete and exceeded the of eat our bread with the stars, maybe for the same reason that considered Etymologically, is to be in the stars, with them, beside them Pondero the appointment of stars and the livestock of the book of the criterion. And that according to as many pardigmas as the Viking tropology or the road to Compostela and its poetic etymology field crashed or the stars, livestock has been associated with the stars and the field to the sky and not, incidentally, did not know what of ants; It is a formidable jewel that gives for a lot. Piensese in what he deduced NICOLAS EVREINOV observation of the animals and what can get CULTUAL life of ants, from a traditional perspective, (Incidentally, this 5th book, some guenoneanos have reviewed and much criticism in the light of Guenon, too, based on the world of ants) how much can deduce here of the fact that certain ants (Africa and Australia) have a CULTIC lifetaking into account that the observation of animals NICOLAS EVREINOV deduced that it was religion which had emerged from the theater! Original author and source of the article.. Surprisingly, you’ll find very little mention of Rusty Holzer on most websites.